Biomathematical Approach to Hormetic Dose–Response and Varietal Radiosensitivity in Nicotiana tabacum L.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69547/TSFJB.030203

Keywords:

radiation biology, seed priming, ionizing radiation, hormesis

Abstract

Low-dose ϒ-irradiation can stimulate seed performance in a biphasic (hormetic) manner, yet most studies remain descriptive and lack quantitative comparability across genotypes and traits. We analyzed three commercial varieties of Nicotiana tabacum L. (Burley, Dark, Virginia) exposed to eight doses (0–20 Gy) and evaluated four endpoint families: Day 9 categorical responses (germination, hypocotyl, cotyledon), kinetic summaries (AUC, T50), and seedling biomass (weeks 2 and 4). We fitted, per variety–endpoint, a quadratic model and the Brain–Cousens hormesis model via bounded nonlinear least squares, compared models by AIC/AICc/BIC, and derived radiosensitivity indices (optimal dose x*, maximal gain Hmax, initial sensitivity S=y'(0), ED50, and hormetic windows W(δ). Across endpoints, Brain–Cousens captured the asymmetry between low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition and was preferred by AICc when an interior maximum was evident; the quadratic provided a parsimonious local descriptor otherwise. Indices revealed variety-specific optima within the classical stimulatory range (≈5–15 Gy) and suggested a qualitative radiosensitivity pattern DK≳BY≳VA rather than a sharply separated ranking. A meta-regression yielded a concise predictive formula for x*  from variety and endpoint, offering an exploratory tool that could inform future data-driven dose recommendations once validated on independent datasets. This parameterization is used here as a phenomenological link to physiology (for example, treating Brain–Cousens parameters as coarse proxies for antioxidant inducibility, tolerance threshold, and transition steepness), while recognizing that such mappings remain speculative in the absence of direct biochemical measurements.

References

Vose PB. Introduction to Nuclear Techniques in Agronomy and Plant Biology. Pergamon Press; 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-024924-7.50020-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-024924-7.50020-X

Savov PG. Radiation Mutagenesis in Wheat. Agricole Publishing Academy; 1989.

Alves LFM, Arthur V. Ionizing radiation in agriculture: physical, biological and ontological approaches. Seven Editora; 2025:36-74. https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2025.039-003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2025.039-003

Kotsyubinskaya OA, Bondarenko EV, Kazydub NG, Blinova YA. Effect of gamma irradiation of seeds on the development of Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants. Vegetable Crops of Russia. 2025; 1:37-44. https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2025-1-37-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2025-1-37-44

Thisawech M, Saritnum O, Sarapirom S, Prakrajang K, Phakham W. Effects of plasma technique and gamma irradiation on seed germination and seedling growth of chili pepper. Chiang Mai J Sci. 2020;47(1):73-82.

Villegas D, Sepúlveda C, Ly D. Use of low-dose gamma radiation to promote the germination and early development in seeds. In: Seed Biology - New Advances. IntechOpen; 2023. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003137

Brain P, Cousens R. An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Res. 1989;29(2):93-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13653180.1989.tb00845.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1989.tb00845.x

Alves LFM, Scheffel LG, Oggero AS, Arthur V. Physiological hormesis induced by low-dose gamma radiation in Nicotiana tabacum L.: varietal differences in early stress response. 2026

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Medeiro Alves, L. F., & Arthur, V. (2025). Biomathematical Approach to Hormetic Dose–Response and Varietal Radiosensitivity in Nicotiana tabacum L. TSF Journal of Biology, 3(2), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.69547/TSFJB.030203